![modelio embedded system example modelio embedded system example](https://www.modeliosoft.com/images/stories/diagrams/use_case/uml-use-case-diagrams.png)
In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop (ICSTW 2008), IEEE (2008)Ĭlarke, E.M., Emerson, A.: Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. ACM, New York (2007)Ĭabot, J., Clariso, R., Riera, D.: Verification of UML/OCL Class Diagrams using Constraint Programming. In: 22nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2007), pp. 31–35 (2008)Ĭabot, J., Clariso, R., Riera, D.: UMLtoCSP: A Tool for the Formal Verification of UML/OCL Models Using Constraint Programming. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Ĭabot, J., Clariso, R.: UML/OCL Verification In Practice. 35–45 (2002)īrucker, A.D., Wolff, B.: HOL-OCL: A Formal Proof Environment for uml/ ocl. In: 3rd International Workshop on Software and Performance, pp. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)īernardi, S., Donatelli, S., Merseguer, J.: From UML Sequence Diagrams and Statecharts to analysable Petri Net models. In: Aichernig, B.K., de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M. 5 (2010)īaresi, L., Morzenti, A., Motta, A., Rossi, M.: Towards the UML-Based Formal Verification of Timed Systems. In: 1st Workshop on Hands-on Platforms and Tools for Model-Based Engineering of Embedded Systems (HoPES 2010), p. 1–4 (2011)īagnato, A., Sadovykh, A., Paige, R.F., Kolovos, D.S., Baresi, L., Morzenti, A., Rossi, M.: MADES: Embedded Systems Engineering Approach in the Avionics Domain. In: 2nd Workshop on Model Based Engineering for Embedded Systems Design (MBED 2011), pp. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īudsley, N.C., Gray, I., Indrusiak, L.S., Kolovos, D., Matragkas, N., Paige, R.: Model-based development of embedded systems - the MADES approach. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Our approach was verified on industrial experiments from the embedded systems domain in the fields of avionics and surveillance. We present one such approach using a tool chain built atop mature, popular and widespread technologies. An approach where model designers can remain working in their domain while the verification is performed on demand, automatically and transparently, is desirable. One of the reasons for this is that model designers do not have the necessary background in mathematical methods. The usage of automated model verification in everyday software engineering practice is far from widespread. Automated model verification is one of the most important examples of this. The benefits of Model Driven Development may be achieved through exploitation of its potential for automation.